Thursday, January 13, 2005
Does Stefan Sharkansky read the stuff to which he links?
Or does the blogger leading the crusade to oust legitimately elected Governor Gregroire just assume his readers won't click through?
It's over, Gregoire won.
And there simply was no fraud.
"Speak Like a Conservative," Nazi Edition...
I'd never understood how the medieval kings found it so easy to get the common people to hate the Jews in their midst. But if those medieval Jewish leaders were anything like the idiots running the ADL, the ACLU and the Council of Jews, one can see where the idea of persecuting them would have held some appeal.Gilliard would translate the above piece as "those kikes are all Commies and coming to eradicate our Christian way of life."
Thanks to Atrios,...
Update...
I mulled this over, and despite Theodore Beale's protestations that he's no anti-semite he still is.
He thinks he's not- or says so- because a) "all" he did was compare abortion to the Holocaust, and b) he's an "evangelical Christian"
Tell me, did the 13 year old who was raped by her dad and sees abortion as the only way out plan a technology for aborting all fetuses?
Did the woman who found out her child that she wanted is anencephalic and will die within days of being born take all the fetuses and cram them into a ghetto?
You could pursue this all day, and in no way could you consider the systematic extermination of a people - and other peoples in the same way as abortion, and to do so minimizes the reality of the horrors that were in that suffering.
Go to Warsaw and see.
Regarding the "I'm an evangelical Christian" excuse, Day/Beale says:
The problem is that whereas Christians have the benefit of what Paul describes in Ephesians as "the full armor of God" and are equipped to fight back against the super-psycho and his legions, Jews have little more than a promise that they will not be completely destroyed.
So, despite their differences on the Messiah's identity, Jews and Christians are on the same team. There is no great division between them, since God does not break His promises and He will keep those that He has made to both peoples.
Ah, how nice. So his god his promising only "almost" successful Holocausts. And he uses this to defend himself from charges of anti-semitism???
Also, the fact that he claims to support "Israeli Jews" is absurd too- does he support the ones - nearly 1/2 the population or more by now- who favor peace with the Palestinians?
And I'd assume he's saying when he says Nazis will have to get past him to get to the Jews is that he's got first dibs on the Jews...
Wednesday, January 12, 2005
You can't make this stuff up: Local (NW) folly...
(Emphasis mine.)According to Deen Gill, a member of Turning Point Christian Center in Vancouver, Wash., the topic of the region's spiritual vitality was raised by Christian author and international speaker Cindy Jacobs during a visit to Portland in early 2003. Gill said Jacobs spoke about the land in the Northwest being sickly. She also mentioned "ley lines" - a network of energy lines originating at spiritual power centers - that had been placed in a grid over the Seattle area by New Age proponents.
Gill did his own research and found that in 2000 a group called The Geo Group did indeed several years ago create the Seattle Ley Line Project as an art project. On its Web site (www.geo.org), The Geo Group describes itself as "a group of artists, architects, landscape architects and 'dowsers' dedicated to creating environmental art for the purposes of world peace."
Dowsing, or water witching, is an ancient spiritual art in which a person, with the aid of a device such as a divining rod or pendulum, gains unseen information at a distance about a person, creature, object, substance, place or "thing" beyond the limitations of one's five senses and normal thought processes. But many Christians believe that dowsing is an occultic form of divination that is condemned in the Bible and should be avoided.
According to Seattle Ley Line Project administrators, dowsing techniques were used to identify and map the major ley lines and spiritual power centers in and around Seattle, Supposedly, both ley lines and water lines create a field of energy that has an effect on consciousness and how people feel Proponents of this assert that they can feel the effects of the energies just like a person feels the effect of a strong cup of coffee.
It took The Geo Group more than three months to dowse Seattle, and according to members' own testimony, "every dowsing session was preceded by meditation and a specific set of spiritual practices."
Gill notes that the Bible clearly states (Lev. 19, Deut. 18, Isa. 15, II Chr. 33 and Gal. 5) that divination is witchcraft, is unholy and will not be tolerated by a holy God.
"My intent is not to frighten us, but to send an alarm to every Blood-bought believer in the Northwest," says Gill. "We do not have to fear because of localized, occult activity in our area. But we must take authority."
What do they mean by "take authority?"
Anyway the rest of the article is interesting in that the view of capitalism as spirituality is the unstated assumption rife in the article. "Spiritual growth" seems to be the conceptual analog of "revenue growth." Another gem along the same lines:
"Ninety percent of churches have no vision or purpose statement," Townsend continued. He said it is vital to church growth for these elements to be identified. He believes a congregation with established goals and an active body will see true spiritual growth. He has seen this happen in other countries such as Colombia where church growth has exploded despite the executions of many Christians. He said miracles are happening daily in other parts of the world because the churches share a common vision.Miracles are happening.....because.....you can't make this stuff up.
If, as some neocons claim, "Americanism is the new Puritanism," clearly capitalism is the new Christian theology.
James Dobson...when will the media get wise to him?
What is odd about this article is the fact that both Hewitt and US News ...
- Don't seem to know who David Barton is...(a "Christian America" "historian" who spoke in front of racist groups in the past)
- Don't seem to get into the real strange dirt surrounding Dobson.
- Don't go near the irony of the article. For example, they teased a quote from Rick "Man on Dog" Santorum saying of Dobson, "I have a very close relationship with Jim."
Tuesday, January 11, 2005
CBS's Story on Bush's TANG, Fast Food, and the Supreme Meal...
However, I think the best critique on this, actually came from Alton Brown, except that he was talking about the movie Supersize Me.
Here’s what it comes down to kids. Ronald McDonald doesn’t give a damn about you. Neither does that little minx Wendy or any of the other icons of drivethroughdom. And you know what, they’re not supposed to. They’re businesses doing what businesses do. They don’t love you. They are not going to laugh with you on your birthdays, or hold you when you’re sick and sad. They won’t be with you when you graduate, when your children are born or when you die. You will be with you and your family and friends will be with you. And, if you’re any kind of human being, you will be there for them. And you know what, you and your family and friends are supposed to provide you with nourishment too. That’s right folks, feeding someone is an act of caring. We will always be fed best by those that care, be it ourselves or the aforementioned friends and family.
We are fat and sick and dying because we have handed a basic, fundamental and intimate function of life over to corporations. We choose to value our nourishment so little that we entrust it to strangers. We hand our lives over to big companies and then drag them to court when the deal goes bad. This is insanity.
Feed yourselves.
Feed your loved ones.
And for God’s sake feed your children.
Don’t trust anyone else to do it…not anyone. I’m not saying that you shouldn’t go out to dinner every now and then…that is after all one of the great joys of life…but it isn’t life itself and that’s what I’m talking about.
As I mentioned over on Carter's blog, the same argument could be made for the so-called "liberal" media:
Educate yourselves, your friends and your families. Be skeptical of information you can't immediately verify. The NBC peacock, the CBS Eye, and Peter Jennings don't give a damn about you, and don't give a damn about informing you. And they're not supposed to. They’re businesses doing what businesses do. They don’t love you.
In the US, the media is the McDonald's of information. Get a nutritious balanced diet of information, and always read the labels (or in the case of the media, the subtext.)
People are shocked when I say it (until they see for themselves), but there's more real content on CCTV-9 than there is on CNN (and one heck of a subtext).
Your worldview is "fed" by the information you take in. Information is like ingredients in a meal.
When this mountain monk [I, Dôgen] was at Tiantong Monastery, the position [of cook] was held by cook Yong, of the same province [as the monastery]. Once, after the midday meal I was passing through the east corridor on my way to the Chaoran room [where my teacher Myôzen was being nursed] when I saw the cook in front of the buddha hall airing mushrooms. He carried a bamboo staff in his hand, but had no hat on his head. The sun was hot, the ground tiles were hot, and sweat streamed over him as he worked diligently to dry the mushrooms. He was suffering a bit. With his backbone bent like a bow and his shaggy eyebrows, he resembled a crane.
I approached and asked the cook his dharma age. He said, "Sixty-eight years." I said, "Why do you not employ postulants or laborers?" He said, "They are not me." I said, "Venerable sir, your attitude is indeed proper, but the sun is so hot; why are you doing this [now]?" The cook said, "What time should I wait for?" I took my leave, but as I walked along the corridor, I began to realize how important an opportunity this position affords.
The media is biased, but not necessarily in the facile ways either the right or left suppose, although frankly, I think better criticism emanates from the left/progressive side than the right side usually (but not this time).
But all the griping obscures a vital fact: there are so many ways to get media today, it's silly not to take advantage of it. And it's equally silly (and disingenuous) to feign disgust when some media mistake happens when you didn't trust them in the first place.
In the long run...
That with my BMI and my ambiguous smoker status (currently ex) but good physical shape (I can burn up 18 calories a minute on cross country machine) give me a range of estimates, the outer one being 84, dying on the day (September 4) on which Hank the Angry Drunken Dwarf went on to the afterlife.
For quality control your rants will be monitored...
Monitoring is intended to track the performance of call center operators, but the professional snoops are inadvertently monitoring callers, too. Most callers do not realize that they may be taped even while they are on hold.
It is at these times that monitors hear husbands arguing with their wives, mothers yelling at their children, and dog owners throwing fits at disobedient pets, all when they think no one is listening. Most times, the only way a customer can avoid being recorded is to hang up.
Dr. Milgram, we really need you now.
Some privacy advocates worry that monitors, as well as operators, can steal customer passwords and other sensitive data. Thus far, few documented cases of identity theft have been unearthed involving monitors, and most monitoring companies screen their applicants. State wiretapping laws generally do not provide protection against recording of call center conversations (the taped message at the start of the call is in most cases considered an adequate privacy warning).
Fears of identity theft have not slowed the monitoring business. In fact, under tighter scrutiny by regulators, most financial institutions are now taping all their calls....
As more call centers move offshore, companies are starting to outsource the monitoring, too.
Wonderful. Somebody might steal your identity in ???? and you'd never know it. Unless they were being monitored. And their monitors were being monitored...
Operators who can defuse aggression - a not-insignificant talent - win plaudits. Operators also have to deal with the slow talkers, the lonely chatterers and the absent-minded. At night, the drunks come out.
Monday, January 10, 2005
One last word on Armstrong Williams...
I guess another reason is that Michael Jackson wouldn't have any credibility pushing a law called "No Child Left Behind."
Update
link
...in addition to being a pundit, Williams, a leading African-American conservative and Clarence Thomas protege, is a PR specialist with his own firm. Not too long ago, Michael Jackson called him for advice.
If only Williams had punted to Jackson at the right time...
``Don't cheerleaders all over America form pyramids six to eight times a year? Is that torture?''
link
Didn't George W. Bush cheerlead in his day?
And besides, how many times have we seen butt-nekkid cheerleader pyramids?
Maybe I would have gone to a game or two in high school if they'd have done that.
Creationists and Theocrats...
I knew about the "wedgie" strategy, and the frauds like Dembski and Behe, but what I didn't know is this (from the above link):
...the Center for Science and Culture laid the groundwork years before [the Dover controversy]. The group provides the "scientific" and philosophical arguments to bolster the opponents of evolution in local political struggles.
CSC operates out of the Discovery Institute, a Seattle think tank that's funded in part by savings and loan heir Howard Ahmanson. As Max Blumenthal reported in a 2004 Salon article, Ahmanson spent 20 years on the board of R.J. Rushdoony's Chalcedon Foundation, a theocratic outfit that advocates the replacement of American civil law with biblical law.
The Chalcedon Foundation is basically an anti-American group that believes they are "called to exercise godly dominion in every sphere with which they come into contact," and that "the notion of godly dominionism has been revived in the United States," and finally,
Chalcedon supports only one form of "racism": God blesses, nourishes, and honors the Royal Race of the Redeemed, all of those of whatever physical race that have placed their faith and trust in Jesus Christ, and God curses the race of the First Adam, all of those who live in unbelief, rebellion, and works-based righteousness (Rom. 5:12-21). This is the only "racial discrimination" the Bible knows anything about.
In other words, this group works actively to foster special rights for reformed Christians.
Their more egregious items have been hidden recently by requiring logins, and might actually be worth the registration to find out what they're up to.
But you can still find traces of the stench...these guys advocate putting people who are non-reformed Christians to death it seems:
It should be noted that Deuteronomy 13:5-18 does not call for the death penalty for unbelief or heresy. It condemns false prophets (vv. 1-5) who seek to lead the people, with signs and wonders, into idolatry. It does condemn individuals who secretly try to start a movement into idolatry (vv. 6-11). It does condemn cities which establish another religion and subvert the law-order of the nation (vv. 13-18), and this condemnation must be enforced by man to turn away the judgment of God (v. 17)." R.J. Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law, (Nutley, NJ: Craig Press, 1973), pp. 38-39.
All in all, when you say "Center for Science and Culture," you're talking about some people who are as un-American as they can be.
Yes, the Republicans are pro-death squads...still
...the Pentagon is intensively debating an option that dates back to a still-secret strategy in the Reagan administration’s battle against the leftist guerrilla insurgency in El Salvador in the early 1980s. Then, faced with a losing war against Salvadoran rebels,he U.S. government funded or supported "nationalist" forces that allegedly included so-called death squads directed to hunt down and kill rebel leaders and sympathizers. Eventually the insurgency was quelled, and many U.S. conservatives consider the policy to have been a success—despite the deaths of innocent civilians and the subsequent Iran-Contra arms-for-hostages scandal. (Among the current administration officials who dealt with Central America back then is John Negroponte, who is today the U.S. ambassador to Iraq. Under Reagan, he was ambassador to Honduras.)
Following that model, one Pentagon proposal would send Special Forces teams to advise, support and possibly train Iraqi squads, most likely hand-picked Kurdish Peshmerga fighters and Shiite militiamen, to target Sunni insurgents and their sympathizers, even across the border into Syria, according to military insiders familiar with the discussions. It remains unclear, however, whether this would be a policy of assassination or so-called "snatch" operations, in which the targets are sent to secret facilities for interrogation. The current thinking is that while U.S. Special Forces would lead operations in, say, Syria, activities inside Iraq itself would be carried out by Iraqi paramilitaries, officials tell NEWSWEEK.
Also being debated is which agency within the U.S. government—the Defense department or CIA—would take responsibility for such an operation. Rumsfeld’s Pentagon has aggressively sought to build up its own intelligence-gathering and clandestine capability with an operation run by Defense Undersecretary Stephen Cambone.
Isn't that special? There's inter-agency bickering over who gets to run the death squads...
And remember folks, last time they didn't care whether or not you were a Christian or an American or whatever. Don't expect them to care this time, either.
Evidently some Republicans (link)
have finally figured out that Iraq wasn't a really great idea, and it's time to get out. Somehow. So the "El Salvador" model is one idea that's come to them: get the country to the "point" where it's like El Salvador was, put in a poop-load of Special Forces types, weapons, and turn a blind eye to the ultra-violence, and - assuming your real adversary, the "Soviets" go belly up in 10 years, voila! "Victory," provided you don't look too closely, or you'll see things like this:
USULUTAN, El Salvador — Teamsters organizer Jose Gilberto Soto liked to call himself "the voice of the voiceless."
In early November, while standing outside his childhood home here, Soto was silenced — shot in the back by unknown assailants. He died moments later in his sister's arms.
The 49-year-old New Jersey resident had planned to meet the next day with truck drivers from El Salvador, Honduras and Nicaragua — part of an ambitious, multi-union effort to organize every step of the global shipping system.
Yes, folks, what a model of "democracy" and "freedom." Keeps on killing.
Thanks to this poster at Kos.
Sunday, January 09, 2005
Zazen Method, Part 1
Walking zazen ("kinhin", pronounced keen-heen) and zazen, wearing clothes as above, the left hand is on the chest and the right hand is folded on it, and holding the left hand, with the feeling in a way that the "folded hands are on target on the chest" so to speak.
Who ended slavery?
The air of England is too pure for a slave to breathe in.'' This phrase, with slight variations, recurs through long years in the rhetoric of movements to abolish first African slavery within England, then the Atlantic traffic in African people that England dominated for more than a century and then the institution of slavery in the British Empire, whose populations included hundreds of thousands of slaves. It is an axiom traditionally believed to have been invoked in 1772, in principle if not verbatim, by Lord Mansfield, the judge in Somerset v. Steuart, which Steven M. Wise in ''Though the Heavens May Fall'' calls the ''trial that led to the end of human slavery.'' Somerset was an African who accompanied Steuart, his owner, to England. He escaped, was recaptured and sued successfully for his freedom.["Bury the Chains:
Both Wise and Adam Hochschild
Prophets and Rebels in the Fight to Free an Empire's Slaves"] celebrate this trial and the events and personalities that brought it about. No doubt they should. It is a melancholy fact, however, that the phenomenon of African slavery loomed as it did over the Atlantic world because, from the reign of Elizabeth I to the reign of George III, England assumed that the air of its colonies, or of any other colony ready to buy, was impure enough to accommodate slavery very nicely.
Wise, the president of the Center for the Expansion of Fundamental Rights, traces with reverent care how the question of the legality of slavery developed within England, culminating in this famous trial. The hero of his narrative is Granville Sharp, a minor government clerk who educated himself in the law in the course of defending the rights of Africans brought into England as slaves. He devoted himself and his slender resources to this work over decades with the object of finally putting an end to slavery itself. The trial, which is said to have abolished slavery within England by legal precedent, was centered on the question of Steuart's right to sell Somerset into the West Indies. Lord Mansfield ruled in favor of Somerset on the grounds that slavery ''is so odious that nothing can be suffered to support it but positive law.'' There being no such law in England, ''the black must be discharged.'' This decision freed an estimated 15,000 Africans then held as slaves in England."
Now where was that "postive law?"
It's been remarked by some historians that one of the main reasons for the American Revolution had to do with precisely this case, and the import that it had for the American economy- especially in the South.
But everybody seems to have dirty hands here...
When the British outlawed the exportation of Africans to the colonies for sale in 1807, they had had almost 20 years' notice that the Americans intended to ban the importation of Africans in 1808...
And there were the rebellions in the West Indies, particularly the Haitian rebellion. ... Since Haiti alone produced as much foreign trade at that time as the whole of the 13 colonies of North America, it was potentially a great loss. It belonged to France, but Britain supplied it with slaves, a valuable trade since the slaves were intentionally worked to death -- it was cheaper to replace them than to sustain them -- so the market for Africans was very brisk. Uprisings had long been frequent in the West Indies, but at long last rage in Haiti converged with the tactical brilliance of Toussaint L'Ouverture and others and the slaves seized the island. This part of the story is familiar. But there is more.
First the British and then the French under Napoleon sent huge forces against the Haitians. The British sent a larger army against Haiti than it had dispatched to fight in the American Revolution. And it buried 60 percent of those soldiers in Haiti. The two greatest powers on earth went up against a population of half-starved, desperate people and were utterly defeated. It is no surprise that these two abysmal wars of empire have fallen out of history. One cannot read about them without concluding that the Haitian Africans contributed mightily to making the Caribbean slave system untenable. All in all, in 1807 the prospects of the traffic in human beings were not good. It is perhaps coincidental that in adopting the abolitionist stance Britain was able to seize the moral high ground and attempt (together with the United States) to suppress the slave trade among its economic rivals. Certainly this posture was gallant enough to make a great part of the world forget that Britain was for so long pre-eminent among the despoilers of Africa. ...
Hochschild interprets the success of the British abolitionist movement as a triumph of empathy, a humane response to horrors of which the public only gradually became conscious. His heroes are Thomas Clarkson, William Wilberforce, Granville Sharp and the former slave Olaudah Equiano, among others. These men did indeed work patiently and passionately for emancipation...
In fact, the slave trade was at home in a world where the appropriation of lives and the extortion of labor were astonishingly commonplace. Hochschild describes the virtual abductions by which slave ships were manned, and tells how these sailors were subject to flogging and starving, and died in numbers as great as did the abducted Africans they helped to transport. And the British Navy was manned in the same way. None of this was at all exceptional, as it would have to have been if there were indeed a presumption of freedom embedded in English culture, as both books assert. No consensus in support of freedom can be demonstrated. The industrialist Robert Owen, writing in 1813, years after the Mansfield decision, describes the transfer to factories of the children of British paupers by the hundreds, 6-, 7- and 8-year-olds who worked 13 hours a day through seven-year apprenticeships. These little workers died quickly and were replaced by other pauper children. They were not slaves in the strictest sense. The system did resemble Caribbean slavery, however, in that it set a negative value on their well-being.
In a world where child labor is commonplace (as it still is in many parts of the world- forget about the sex trafficking for a microsecond), where workers are still worked to death in many places, can we actually say that slavery has ended? Did Franklin Roosevelt help end that in the US?
Can we also just as well say, as Ms. Robinson seems to imply, that the Haitian slaves did a great deal to end slavery, perhaps freeing more slaves than Wilberforce?
Saturday, January 08, 2005
Why the NYT lets down moderates and progressives, reason #5,247
Most of the pharmacies in China that dispense Western-style medicines have an antiquated, if reassuring, air about them. There are no posters on the walls for brand-name drugs. Candy is not for sale. Photo processing is not available. Druggists work in long white lab coats and surgical hats that could have been salvaged from a World War II hospital ship. Some pharmacies require prescriptions for the most potent drugs, others only an earnest chat with a druggist. Drug orders create paperwork that passes through three or four bureaucratic layers before reaching the solemn cashier, who issues a handwritten receipt.
Such an old-fashioned scene might argue for just how far China trails the United States and other advanced economies, where both science and marketing are seemingly years ahead.
First of all, all the pharmacies I've been in during my visits to China didn't have "three or four bureaucratic layers." In fact, typically, the sales person was the pharmacist and was the cashier. (We're talking Western style pharamcies here, not traditional Chinese herbalists, which are different, but actually, there too, there aren't "three or four" bureaucratic layers.)
Secondly, Chinese pharmacies look and operate just like German ones in Munich or formerly West Berlin.
The NYT- keeping Americans ignorant of international conditions for geez, how long now?
However, if you read the above linked article keep the following in mind:
1. Do we really need all those drugs? (Many drugs, such as Clarinex don't seem to have a good reason for being around given the alternatives already exist)
2. Aren't drugs just like "content" - overpriced? I mean, really, is a DVD really "worth" 20 bucks in the US new, 40 bucks "new" in Japan and 1 buck new in China? Really? Why should Americans pay 20 times the real cost of the DVD? Or the Viagra? To keep people employed? Maybe there's Quality Control issues, maybe there is strategic reason to keep drugs manufactured in the US, (actually I think that's quite true), but, OTOH, advertising is quite a large part of drugs' budget in the US.
Normally, when it comes to manufacturing, I'm on the side of American workers, simply because I don't want to see living standards further decline here, and I think working against what seems to be a natural "American" xenophobia is a good thing.
But those first 2 paragraphs of the Times' piece - well, the stereotypes were running full bore there.
Friday, January 07, 2005
Weight loss companies, low carb, and teachers...
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Proclaiming an end to the low-carb diet craze, U.S. weight loss companies are launching a marketing blitz aimed at winning over consumers resolved to shed flab once and for all in the New Year.
As the number of Americans following low-carbohydrate regimens like Atkins and South Beach continues to fall, stalwart diet companies such as Weight Watchers International Inc. (Research) and Jenny Craig Inc. are confident they can regain the upper hand in 2005.
Already, Weight Watchers shares have gained nearly 16 percent in the last 2 months, partly in anticipation of an improved outlook.
Really? They think they're going to benefit? Why?
link
Design, Setting, and Participants A single-center randomized trial at an academic medical center in Boston, Mass, of overweight or obese (body mass index: mean, 35; range, 27-42) adults aged 22 to 72 years with known hypertension, dyslipidemia, or fasting hyperglycemia. Participants were enrolled starting July 18, 2000, and randomized to 4 popular diet groups until January 24, 2002....
Results Assuming no change from baseline for participants who discontinued the study, mean (SD) weight loss at 1 year was 2.1 (4.8) kg for Atkins (21 [53%] of 40 participants completed, P = .009), 3.2 (6.0) kg for Zone (26 [65%] of 40 completed, P = .002), 3.0 (4.9) kg for Weight Watchers (26 [65%] of 40 completed, P < .001), and 3.3 (7.3) kg for Ornish (20 [50%] of 40 completed, P = .007). Greater effects were observed in study completers. Each diet significantly reduced the low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio by approximately 10% (all P<.05), with no significant effects on blood pressure or glucose at 1 year. Amount of weight loss was associated with self-reported dietary adherence level (r = 0.60; P<.001) but not with diet type (r = 0.07; P = .40). For each diet, decreasing levels of total/HDL cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and insulin were significantly associated with weight loss (mean r = 0.36, 0.37, and 0.39, respectively) with no significant difference between diets (P = .48, P = .57, P = .31, respectively).
The differences in the diets- especially the retention rates- are not statistically significant.
Check out the curves...
Looks also like Weight Watchers is worst for insulin...
Now what this all means, I guess, is that for pure weight loss, some form of discipline is more important than anything else. For me, cutting out refined starches and potatoes worked wonders- along with exercise.
At the moment I'm on to refining the exercise method.
But I've always been suspicious of groups like Weight Watchers. If they're successful- really succeesful- they lose a customer. Of course, teachers are supposed to be able to do that, too. Some do. The good ones.
Why the Republican Party Must be Stopped...
You can't make this stuff up.
Basically women who get pregnant and whose zygotes don't attach to the uterine wall become the equivalent of stalkers in Virginia if this clown Cosgrove has his way.
"Morality" + Talk Radio Payola...
Now I'd suspect Limbaugh of this forever, but I'm surprised that they picked the "morality" guy that allegedly was a bit over-interested in David Brock's sex life.
This is Payola, folks. Maybe Air America does it too, probably Limbaugh does it too, but if these charges are true, Armstrong Williams should meet the fate of Alan Freed.
An American Buddhist Response to Americanism...
Updated: It appears that the original version of this was perhaps too reactive to the article in Commentary, and didn't really accurately portray a Buddhist response to the notion of "America," although I think as a reaction to an "-ism," it's not a bad first cut. The fact is, all political designs, like any design, is a reflection of the people that make them, and what one might say the prevailing social and ideological karma, for want of a better term. The United States simply could not have existed in the way we (or at least many of us) know it without the Enlightenment, the Thirty Years' War, and yes, the Puritans.
That doesn't make us better, and it doesn't make us worse. It in no way justifies triumphalism or condemnation.
Moreover, because of the abundance of greed, hatred and ignorance (as well as wisdom, compassion and generosity) the United States, while having some incredibly good aspects of its society and government envied by the rest of the world (e.g., attempted fidelity to the rule of law, as someone in China pointed out to me) there are still unintended consequences to our society and government; e.g., federalism hinders community, which in turn leads to regional factionalism.
All nation states are engineered imperfectly. We have been relatively lucky to be spared a Pol Pot or a Hitler, but we should not be like a gambler who prides himself on his "skill" having bet at roulette on black 6 times and winning.
That said, I cannot but find the article referenced highly superficial, simply because it lacks any semblance of nuance.
We Buddhists tend not to be partial to "-isms" of any stripe- pro anti. "The -ism is not it" might be a good motto for us. Joe Carter cliams that anti-Americanism "is is closely associated with anti Christianism and anti-Semitism. Anti-Americans are still fascinated and enraged by Americans’ 'bizarre tendency to believe in God.'"
Mr. Carter has offered a "symposium prize" for the best reveiws of Gelernter's article.
So, intrigued, (fascinated?) I go off to Joe's link, remembering Woody Allen's famous remark about how Dissent and Commentary's merger had become Dysentery. Commentary - like Susan Sontag- has become famously irrelevant over the years except for those who want to view the ideological analog of a car accident on a freeway.
Gelernter defines "Americanism" as "the set of beliefs that are thought to constitute America’s essence and to set it apart; the beliefs that make Americans positive that their nation is superior to all others—morally superior, closer to God."
Whenever I see things like this whether from the People's Daily, The New York Times, or National Review, a flag goes up: Who thinks these beliefs constitute America's essence? Well clearly Gelernter, for starters.
"America is Deconstruction," so it wasn't Derrida who posits an Americanism, (as expected.) And yep, it's Gelernter's straw man: America has an "-ism," and it's dead serious about it. Thanks for speaking for me Mr. Gelernter- it's about as profound as speaking for those NASCAR dads, soccer/security moms, my 3 year old, the cleaning ladies in the Hyatt Regency in Monterey, and Marty Beckerman.
Anyway, Gelernter- I'm curious as to Carter's take on this by now, because the reasoning here is shoddy to the point of apalling- goes on: "In the late-18th and 19th centuries, America stood for radical republicanism and the breaking-down of inherited rank—grounds for hatred among much of the European elite."
America, in the late 18-th and 19th centuries stood for continuance of the slave trade, imperialism, cheap labor, the later suppression of labor unions, the subjugation of indigenous peoples, and the hegemony of people to the south of our borders. This is hardly a "breaking-down of inherited rank," except insofar as it challenged the greed of the Europeans. But it is no cause for any kind of moral superiority to which Gelernter may be hinting. We can say that in some ways America was better than other countries; in some ways worse. We got a big break from acquiring a land from indigenous peoples and Mexicans that hadn't fully exploited its resources. But that gives us no moral advantage.
Let me quote one passage at length:
Over the roughly four centuries of American and proto-American existence, it has also inspired remarkable feats of devotion. You would need some sort of fierce determination to set forth in a puny, broad-beamed, high-pooped, painfully slow, nearly undefended 17th-century ship to cross the uncharted ocean to an unknown, unmapped new world. You would need remarkable determination to push westward into the heartland away from settlement and safety.
This "devotion" was in many cases "desperation." From the Irish famine to the pogroms to the grinding poverty in Mexico today it's desperation and resentment that drives immigrants which is transmuted into a hope.
What's interesting to me, is, having seen a bit of the world, this desperation has resulted in immigrant journeys in many other places- Japanese to Brazil, Chinese to Mexio, Indians Venezuela. But Americans don't know about that. Why? Americans don't know how many people leave the US every year (currently I think there's at least 6 million non-military-related ex-pats).
Let me deal with Gelernter's article that in one place directly talks about Buddhism:
Can you be an agnostic or atheist or Buddhist or Muslim and a believing American too? In each case the answer is yes. But to accomplish that feat is harder than most people realize. The Bible is not merely the fertile soil that brought Americanism forth. It is the energy source that makes it live and thrive; that makes believing Americans willing to prescribe freedom, equality, and democracy even for a place like Afghanistan, once regarded as perhaps the remotest region on the face of the globe.
Now the bible was never part of American culture as defined as the nation was; it was of course what folks thought of as religion even as they whipped their slaves, slaughtered the Indians, brewed their moonshine, murdered their Mormons and Shakers, etc.
But Gelernter may be on to something here: just as one needs a certain selective myopia to exalt the bible (ignoring or explaining away its inconsistencies, its advocacy of genocide, its historical use as a method of subjugation) one also needs a selective lack of conciousness to be the kind of "American" Gelernter promotes. And yeah, we Buddhists, who are about being mindful have a problem with that, becaue despite the uncomfortable nature of all the greed, hatred and ignorance in ourselves, and others, we still find it better to be aware of the nasty stuff than to gloss it over in a feel good "Americanism," especially one which looks increasingly like what Romans thought of the empire even as it declined.
I could go on more- Gelernter's take on Puritanism leaves out witch hunts, which I think is telling, too. Gelernter's analogy might be spot on in one streak of being an American, but if you want the Puritan, you've got to take the witch hunt along with it.
All in all, this article is what's wrong with America today: it seems to be slipshod, second rate reasoning, and lacking in those things- like hard work and humility- that made Americans take advantage - in a good sense- of where they found themselves.
Thursday, January 06, 2005
Bush still gets that *...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Citing widespread irregularities on Election Day, a handful of House Democrats and one senator objected Thursday to the counting of Ohio's 20 electoral votes, delaying the official certification of the 2004 presidential election results.
The Democrats said they were not trying to overturn President Bush's re-election but want to draw attention to the need for aggressive election reform in the wake of what they said were widespread voter problems.
In a letter to congressional leaders Wednesday, members of the group said they would take the action because a new report by Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee found "numerous, serious election irregularities," particularly in Ohio, that led to "a significant disenfranchisement of voters."
The House of Representatives and Senate met Thursday afternoon in a constitutionally mandated session to count the electoral votes. Vice President Dick Cheney, in his role as president of the Senate, presided over the session.
Four years ago, after the disputed election results in Florida, members of the Congressional Black Caucus attempted to block Florida's electoral votes from being counted. In a scene recalled in the movie "Fahrenheit 9/11," lawmaker after lawmaker was gaveled down by Vice President Al Gore because no senator would support the objections, as the law requires.
This is great news, because it moves us ever so slightly in the direction verifiable, uniform, fair election standards, and towards democracy in general, and away from the tactics of the Republican Party.
And it means that - yet again- Bush's presidency gets that *.
He's still questionably the "president."