He's avoided social media, so I thought I'd weigh in on a few of his recent posts....
- On transgender-ness, I think there's more science around this than Ven. Warner gives credit.
- I do wish Ven. Warner would really look at his own politicization of Buddhism more deeply than bash "progressive" Buddhist teachers. I cannot really compare a teacher's visit to Yasukuni Shrine with supporting a regime that is harming so many people such as our present one.
Also, he really ought to study history more...
And yet when I look at the overall history of Buddhism, I see it as generally apolitical. For example, in Dogen’s voluminous writings I can only recall a couple of very tangential references to anything one might call “political.” He had some financial support from certain of the samurai and every once in a while he refers to them, but that’s about it.
Well, actually, I could think of more than a few reasons why Dogen didn't write much political stuff. Like, for example, because of who he was, as Ven. Warner points out, he was not really in a position to state things that would be critical of the shogun. For example. But generally apolitical? Give me a break. Not just Tibet. Check out the history of the Mongols, and the role Chan and other Buddhists played in the Yuan Dynasty.
All of that said, I mildly agree with his larger point, that Buddhism should in general be welcoming of political differences. Where he and I disagree is that there is a point where the political difference becomes an obligation to speak out because of concern for others. In general, I find Ven. Warner blissfully unaware of the fact that there are many who are indeed suffering in the US and the world because of the political situation.
- I do wish Ven. Warner broadened his horizons. There's a heck of a lot of ancient teachers out there besides Dogen.
Finally...
- Regarding Buddhist robes, ...
- At my recent sesshin I was asked to wear the top of a samue, as per the rest of attendees. I should have brought one that I own, but didn't think of it when I packed. It did make a difference in my practice in that it helped underscore the gravity of the task at hand.
- I'm a little surprised at Ven. Warner's remark that his teacher didn't do chanting 'cause the thought there was too much of it in Japan. In my experience that Western trained teachers don't do chanting nearly as well, as effectively, as the Rinzai Japanese teachers I've known. I'm sure he's saying true things there, but still...
- He's right; the robes are a costume, but then is there any difference between "playing" a Zen priest and being a Zen priest?
- Again, at my recent sesshin, I made reference - very obliquely - to the ubiquity of mud at Tahoma-san. Harada-roshi was not wearing particularly fancy robes, and his not particularly fancy robes were not immune to the mud. I think that was kind of the best "answer" to the point of Warner's post here.
