Saturday, December 18, 2004

Speaking of catastrophes...

the flu shot shortage (has it abated?) was one example...and another is alluded to in the NY Times today:


Yet few of these imports are examined to ensure they meet American health and safety standards. This year, the Food and Drug Administration will inspect about 100,000 of the nearly five million shipments of food crossing our borders, and distribution is so rapid that tainted food can reach consumers nationwide before officials realize there is a problem. The increasing control of the global food supply by a few corporations has made such tampering even more tempting for a terrorist who wants to have a big impact.

You might think that the solution is obvious: we should rely on our domestic food supply. Unfortunately, when it comes to food security, our vulnerabilities at home rival those we face abroad. The federal government's encouragement of consolidation in agriculture diminishes the security of our food supply.

Since the 1950's, American agricultural policies have been grounded in the belief that farms should produce as much food as possible for the least cost. These policies have led to a landscape of fewer but bigger farms that specialize in a decreasing number of commodities that are destined for fewer processors and packers.


The free market is -again- failing us on the food front. Think tomatos. We need, to prevent catastrophes, redundancy in our food supply distribution system...and that costs a bit more money....

Luckily, landowners can grow gardens...

No comments: